<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dooba.net &#187; OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dooba.net/tag/os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dooba.net</link>
	<description>Tech, Science, Insanity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OSX Internals Book</title>
		<link>http://dooba.net/2009/06/15/osx-internals-book/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=osx-internals-book</link>
		<comments>http://dooba.net/2009/06/15/osx-internals-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dooba.net/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I picked up this book a while back. I got a job at NVIDIA with the OS X drivers team, so I was brushing up on things. This is pretty much THE book for info on system internals, kernel coding, etc. It&#8217;s rather large and takes a while to get through, but the info is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up this book a while back. I got a job at NVIDIA with the OS X drivers team, so I was brushing up on things.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mac-OS-Internals-Systems-Approach/dp/0321278542/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1245128962&#038;sr=8-1"><img src="http://dooba.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/cover_small.jpg" alt="cover_small" title="cover_small" width="208" height="275" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-83" /></a></p>
<p>This is pretty much THE book for info on system internals, kernel coding, etc. It&#8217;s rather large and takes a while to get through, but the info is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dooba.net/2009/06/15/osx-internals-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 versus Mac OS X Leopard the feature by feature showdown</title>
		<link>http://dooba.net/2009/06/11/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature-by-feature-showdown/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature-by-feature-showdown</link>
		<comments>http://dooba.net/2009/06/11/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature-by-feature-showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Markis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dooba.net/2009/06/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature-by-feature-showdown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lifehacker had an article regarding Windows 7 versus Mac OS X Leopard: http://lifehacker.com/5277207/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature+by+feature-showdown Personally I think this article was a little gutsy when the WWDC was going to be the very next week and it was guaranteed that it was going to announce the successor to Leopard: Snow Leopard.  To summarize the competition was close [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lifehacker had an article regarding Windows 7 versus Mac OS X Leopard:<br />
<a title="http://lifehacker.com/5277207/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature+by+feature-showdown" href="http://lifehacker.com/5277207/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature+by+feature-showdown">http://lifehacker.com/5277207/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature+by+feature-showdown</a></p>
<p>Personally I think this article was a little gutsy when the WWDC was going to be the very next week and it was guaranteed that it was going to announce the successor to Leopard: Snow Leopard.  To summarize the competition was close but Snow Leopard was decided as the favored operating system.  The author’s comparison points were interesting and I think it was a fair assessment of the two operating systems. </p>
<p>However, I thought it was bizarre that they would compare Time Machine to Windows backup.  My first thought was about how I never use windows backup.  I just make a habit to store my important files on a secondary drive and keep the operating system on it’s own drive.  The real backup system is <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/windowshomeserver/default.mspx">Windows Home Server</a>.  And then a colleague of mine at work pointed out their poll at the bottom of article asks for people to rate the favorite feature about each operating system, and with 10% of the votes Time Machine was the readers favorite feature of Leopard.  Wait, I thought Mac’s were secure and didn’t crash, then why is the backup/rollback system the favored feature? I think I deal more with the taskbar, themes, aero and the file explorer way more than I ever think about my backup.  I am happy it’s there but I tend to go more with the set and forget it method.  But, I guess that is just me.  That’s just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dooba.net/2009/06/11/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature-by-feature-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
